Spil with mining, what are the bitcoin miners truly solving? I read they are solving hashes, but what does that indeed mean. Can wij see what they are solving? Can someone give an example of what a bitcoin mining machine sees to solve?

## Four Answers

They attempt to find a random nonce (a little random gegevens) that goes into a block and makes the block have a (SHA256) hash that (ter binary) starts with a certain amount of 0’s. The more zeroes the more uncommon hash is. A good hash’ outcome is not predictable, and so you have to attempt a lotsbestemming of times to find a good nonce.

The amount of zeroes are based on how difficult it is supposed to be to find a block. Ter Bitcoin it adjusts to have a fresh block every Ten minutes (on average, given the rate at which previous blocks are found).

Interesting: because the hashes are unpredictable it doesn’t matter how the nonce switches! Most of the time it’s just a number counting upwards from 0!

Here is an enormously simplified sketch of the problem, but it should give a pretty good idea of what the problem is.

This is the hash of the lastest block (shortened to 30 characters):

Thesis are the hashes of a few valid transactions waiting for inclusion (shortened).

And this the hash of one special transaction that you just crafted, which gives 25BTC (the current prize) to yourself:

Now, let’s use a gross approximation of what a fresh block might look like (the real one uses binary format). It contains the hash of the previous block and the hashes of those Three transactions:

Now let’s do mining by arm! Our purpose is to finish this block with a nonce (a lump of garbage) such that the hash of the fresh block starts with 13 zeros (considering the previous hash, it seems that 13 zeroes is the current difficulty!).

**Mining (attempting to finalize this block):**

Let’s attempt with nonce=1, and compute the hash of the block (I’m using the md5 hash algorithm, but Bitcoin uses dual sha256):

No luck, the hash does not embark with a 0… Let’s attempt with nonce=Two

If wij pursue until nonce=16, wij get our very first leading zero.

For nonce=208, wij get two leading zeroes!

Proceed like this… If you ultimately find a hash that has 13 leading zeroes… you’re a winner! Other miners will now build upon your block, you’ve just got 25BTC.

But you’ll have to be prompt!

If someone manages to build a block before you do, you’ll have to commence again from the beginning with the fresh block’s hash (the one of the winner).

Ten minutes? Two) How does that transaction come to mij anyway? Three) What if I find a solution for this block and then a fresh transaction comes to mij from some other knot who accepted it for the block I just closed? &ndash, keremispirli Apr 28 ’14 at 17:24

The following is a description of the global, statistical gamble which is played every Ten or so minutes. The interval of the spel is managed by the difficulty which says how many “hashes” are needed vanaf interval.

Ter other words, the difficulty and target define the “odds of the house” against your chance of getting a winning SHA hash. The nonce is the “scrape off” area.

Each hash consumes electro-therapy, and emits fever, which requires extra cooling.

This is what is done with each hash:

At a high level, the miner software takes a list of active transactions, and then groups them together ter something called a “block”.

Or more accurately stated: The miner software coverts all the transactions into a summary view called a “merkle root”, and hashes it, which is representative of the transactions.

Then mining software converts this to into a binary format called a Block Header, which also references the previous blocks (also called a chain).

The miner hardware switches a petite portion of this block called a “nonce”.

The block header is hashed and compared to the Target spil if it were simply a large number like Ten,000,000 > 7,000,000 (the real numbers are much thicker, and ter hex). The target is compressed and stored te each block ter a field called kattig.

An expanded target looks like this:

And the purpose is to make sure the SHA256 hash of the block is less than this value. Te the example below ” 83ee ” is smaller than ” 83ef “

To simplify this concept, you can ballpark the target by counting the leading zeros (spil the other response here explains). Here is an example:

That previous hash wasgoed from today and has 14 leading zeroes. Let’s compare that to what wasgoed needed Trio years ago with block 100 which has 8 leading zeros.

So at the end of the day, all a miner does is:

- Take a block header spil input
- Switch the Nonce
- Test if the Block Header hash is less than the Target. If it is, you win.
- Go to step Two (or go to step 1 if someone else won the block)

Want to see what Bitcoin-QT does when it finds a block. I posted it here.. The information ter this postbode will help you understand what happened.

Mining provides a way to reach overeenstemming on what the transaction ledger should look like and know that nobody is cheating.

That’s the non-technical definition of mining.

The “authority” for dual spending is the blockchain. The blockchain consists of the history of all blocks ter the blockchain plus the next block of transactions. The prize subsidy presently is 25 BTC to the party that submits the next block. But hey . you would like that 25 BTC (worth presently about $825) spil would I spil would everyone else. So how do you make it so that I can’t cheat and eis the block myself?

Well, you waterput te a system that you and I have to challenge. That’s what the proof of work does — it makes it so that when I voorkoop the prize it is effortless to prove that I truly did the work involved. So for mij to have a 2% chance of solving a block I need to waterput ter 2% of of the mining work. There’s no way for mij to waterput te less than 2% of all the work and still solve blocks at least 2% of the time (on average).

Thus spil a result, when a transaction block is submitted, all the peers verify that there were no dual spends, that the right amount of subsidy wasgoed claimed, and that the submitter truly expended the work necessary for that solution. With those three rules, then there doesn’t not need to be a central authority managing the process or able to control the outcome.